Dismissed

Saroja @ Sarojini.G v. the Secretary

Madras HC24 Feb 2021WMP(MD)/2934/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought to withdraw the writ petition to pursue a revisional remedy. The court granted permission to withdraw the miscellaneous petition, leading to the disposal of both the main petition and the connected writ petition without adjudication on merits.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the petition; consequences being dismissal of W.M.P and rejection of connected W.P.

Saroja @ Sarojini.G Vs the Secretary — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.M.P(MD)No.2934 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.02.2021 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN WMP(MD)No.2934 of 2021 in WP(MD)SR.No.9469 of 2021 and WP(MD)SR.No.9469 of 2021

¶4

1.G.Saroja @ Sarojini 2.G.Uma Maheswari 3.G.Balaji 4.G.Lakshmi Narayanan ..Petitioners/ petitioners Vs 1.The Secretary, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management, Chepauk, Chennai. 3.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 4.The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai 5.The Special Deputy Collector, Revenue Court, Madurai. 6.The Record Officer, Tenancy Right cum Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai. 7.A.Suresh Fredrick Clement, Thasildar, Social Security Scheme, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai. 8.The Village Administrative Officer, Eraniyam Village, Eraniyam, Madurai North Taluk,Madurai. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶5

1/3

¶6

W.M.P(MD)No.2934 of 2021

¶7

9.T.Muthukrishnan, Village Administrative Officer, Kannanenthal Village, Kannanenthal, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai District.

¶8

10.R.Alagarsamy

¶9

... Respondents/ Respondents

¶10

PRAYER in W.M.P(MD)No.2934 of 2021: Petition filed, under Rule 2B of the Appellate Side Rules to regulate the proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to permit the petitioners to herein to join together and file a single writ petition.

¶11

PRAYER in W.P(MD)SR.No.9469 of 2021: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the impugned order passed by the 5^th respondent in Appeal No.3/2020 dated 22.01.2021 pursuant to the impugned order passed by the 6^th respondent in Na.Ka.No.7981/2019/Aa1, dated 28.02.2020 and quash the same as illegal and consequently, direct the 6^th respondent to remove the Tenancy Rights recorded in favour of the 10^th respondent.

¶12

For Petitioner : Ms.Kannan.R.R

¶13

ORDER

¶14

When this Court expressed its intention to dismiss the writ petition on merits as revisional remedy is available to the petitioner, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶15

2.In view of the above, permission is granted. The miscellaneous stands dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected W.P[MD]SR.No.9469 of 2021 stands rejected. No costs.

// True Copy //

dsk

1.The Secretary,

Department of Revenue and Disaster Management, Secretariat, Chennai. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

2/3

¶22

W.M.P(MD)No.2934 of 2021

¶23

2.The Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management, Chepauk, Chennai.

¶24

3.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 4.The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai 5.The Special Deputy Collector, Revenue Court, Madurai. 6.The Record Officer, Tenancy Right cum Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai. 7.The Village Administrative Officer, Eraniyam Village, Eraniyam, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai. Copy to The Section Officer English Records(Writs) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai

¶25

W.M.P(MD)No.2934 of 2021 and WP(MD)SR.No.9469 of 2021 24.02.2021

¶26

MJ(CO) KB(03.03.2021) 3P 9C

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

3/3

Saroja @ Sarojini.G v. the Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saroja @ Sarojini.G v. the Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nadar Committee Higher Secondary School, Vs The Director of School Education

Rahman Beevi Vs The Special Commissioner and

Palanivelsamy Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

Gurusamy.K.S. Vs the District Collector

Rajalakshmi. N Vs The District Revenue Officer

Vasantha Vs the District Collector