S.N.S.Sukumaran v. R.Lakshmi
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought to be impleaded as a respondent in two writ petitions challenging revenue official acts. The court allowed the applications to restrict registration of the writ petition and extended interim orders.
What did the court decide?
Impleadment of petitioner as 8th and 10th respondents in respective writ petitions was allowed. Registry to amend notices showing petitioner as respondent.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Special Original Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Fourth day of August Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
WMP NOs.3294 AND 3299 OF 2021
IN WP.NOS.25368 AND 29211 OF 2019
S.N.S.SUKUMARAN [PETITIONER IN BOTH THE PETITIONS] Vs
1 R.LAKSHMI [RESPONDENTS IN WMP.NO.3294/2021 IN WP.29211/2019] 2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR TIRUPPUR DISTRICT
3 THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER TIRUPPUR, DISTRICT COLLECTOR OFFICE, TIRUPPUR
4 THE SUB-COLLECTOR/REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPPUR, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT
5 JEYAKUMAR THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUPPUR NORTH, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the petitioner to be impleaded as a respondent in pending writ petitions.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.N.S. Sukumaran
- respondent
R.Lakshmi
- respondent
District Collector Tiruppur
- respondent
District Revenue Officer Tiruppur
- respondent
Sub-Collector/Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruppur
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court