Applications for substitution of the deceased petitioner with his daughter were allowed. The Registry was directed to make consequential amendments in the writ petitions after accepting evidence of death and relationship.
Applications for substitution are allowed and Registry is directed to amend writ petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.M.P.No.14235 of 2021 in W.P.No.34652 of 2019 and W.M.P.No.14236 of 2021 in W.P.No.7280 of 2020
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
These applications have been
filed to substitute Ms.Kalpana in the place of the erstwhile writ petitioner, Mr.A.Periaswamy, in W.P.Nos.34652 of 2019 and 7280 of 2020.
Since it is stated that the erstwhile petitioner died on June 11, 2021 due to Covid-19 infection and relevant documents have been produced to substantiate that the proposed substituted petitioner is the daughter of the erstwhile petitioner, these applications, W.M.P.Nos.14235 and 14236 of 2021, for substitution are allowed.
The Registry is directed to carry out the consequential amendment in the writ petitions.
sasi/bbr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Ms. Kalpana is entitled to be substituted as petitioner in place of the deceased Mr. A. Periaswamy.
Ms. Kalpana
Mr. A. Periaswamy
Chief Justice
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
