The Single Bench dismissed the writ appeal as unsuccessful. The court held that preserving the respondent's liberty to question fresh orders, the appeal deserves dismissal. No costs.
The writ appeal has been dismissed by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.A.(MD)No.1113 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.06.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI
W.A.(MD)No.1113 of 2021
M.Raju
... Appellant/Petitioner Vs.
The District Treasury Officer, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. ... Respondent/Respondent
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order of this Court made in W.P.(MD) No.10225 of 2009, dated 25.06.2019.
Prayer in WP(MD). 10225 of 2009 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a WRIT OF CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS, calling for the records issued by the respondent in his proceedings No.Mu.Mu.2268/09/A1 dated 28-08-2009 and quash the same and direct the respondent to draw the seniority list for the year 1997 (i.e.) as on 15-03-1997 and grant promotion to the petitioner based on the seniority list of Accountant / Assistant drawn as on 15-03-1997 and grant all other attendant benefits and arrears of pay and allowances.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For Repondent : Mr.A.K.Manickam, Government Counsel
J U D G M E N T
[Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J .]
We have heard Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr.A.K.Manickam, learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondent.
1/2
W.A.(MD)No.1113 of 2021
person has been promoted over and above the appellant overlooking the seniority. Though the appellant was not able to establish the same, the learned Writ Court issued a direction to the authorities to verify the service particulars and if there is any incorrect information provided, which has to be verified by the authorities and suitable action to be taken. After the direction was issued, the appellant rightly submitted a representation which appears to have been rejected.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-II)
pkn
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To,
The District Treasury Officer, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.
+2 CC to M/s.T.LAJAPATHIROY, Advocate ( SR-19578 & 19502[F]) +1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-19671[F] )
W.A.(MD)No.1113 of 2021 16.06.2021
vr(CO)
TR(23.06.2021) 2P 5C
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ appeal against the Single Bench order granting a direction to verify service particulars for seniority promotion succeeds.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M.Raju
District Treasury Officer, Ramanathapuram District
T.S.Sivagnanam
S.Ananthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
