The High Court of Madras dismissed the Writ Appeal filed by E.M.Sekar for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear on the scheduled hearing date despite service of notice.
Writ Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.12.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
Writ Appeal No.959 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013
E.M.Sekar ...Appellant
Vs.
Dharmapuri District.
Dharmapuri District.
Domestic Enquiry Officer, No.183, R.G.Nagar, Kannangkurichi, Salem – 8.
Deputy Registrar Retd./ Domestic Enquiry Officer, 516, Cuddalore Main Road, Kamaraj Nagar Colony, Salem – 636 104. ...Respondents
Prayer : Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the order dated 23.01.2013 made in W.P.No.12564 of 2012.
Prayer in W.P.No.12564 of 2012:Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings Na.Ka.No.4991/2005 Tho.Sa. dated 16.03.2012 passed by the 1st respondent herein and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to pass final orders in the petitioners domestic enquiry proceedings.
For Appellant : Drafted notice served - No appearance
For R1 : Mr.U.Baranidharan Additional Government Pleader For R2 : Mr.M.S.Palaniswamy
J U D G M E N T
(Delivered by M. DURAISWAMY, J.)
Though the drafted notice sent to the sole appellant has been served on him on 04.12.2021 and his name has been printed in the cause list, none appeared for him on 16.12.2021. Hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption “For dismissal” on 17.12.2021. Though the matter has been listed under the caption “For dismissal”, today also, none appeared for the appellant. Hence, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the Writ Appeal for non-prosecution.
2.Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS III)
/True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mkn
To
Writ Appeal No.959 of 2013
GP[co] NSK 10/01/2022
E.M.Sekar
The Joint Registrar of Co-op. Societies
The Special Officer, K.K.162, N.S.Reddiyur Primary Agricultural Co-op. Credit Society
N.V.Anandan
S.Natarajan
M. DURAISWAMY
J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
