An appeal filed against an order dismissing a writ petition regarding teacher eligibility was dismissed as infructuous without detailed reasoning by the High Court of Judicature at Madras.
Writ Appeal dismissed as infructuous. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.11.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY AND THE HON'BLE MR.J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
W.A.NO.2359 OF 2013 AND M.P.NOS.1 & 2 OF 2013
.. Appellants
vs.
.. Respondents
Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 23.09.2013 made in W.P.No.21917 of 2013 on the file of this Court.
Prayer in W.P.No.21917 of 2013:
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the 3rd respondent from applying G.O.Ms.181 School Education (C2) Department dated 15.11.2011 to the petitioners and insisting on
Teacher Eligibility Test as a minimum qualification for appointment to the posts of Graduate Assistants in classes VI to X in the schools coming under the Directorate of School Education and Elementary Education and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioners who have completed certificate verification on 14-05-2010 to the post of graduate Assistants in classes VI to X in the schools coming under the Directorate of School Education and Elementary Education in the future vacancies without insisting on Teachers Eligibility Test qualification in view of clause 5 of the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) dated 23/08/2010.
For Appellants : Ms.C.Uma
For Respondents : Mr.C.Kathiravan, Special Government Pleader
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was made by M.DURAISWAMY,J. )
Ms. C.Uma, learned counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that the prayer sought for in the Writ Appeal has become infructuous, hence, the Writ Appeal may be dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Rj
To
W.A.No.2359 of 2013 and
BP(CO) RLP(09/12/2021)
D.Muthu Erulayee
M.Mahendravarman
The State of Tamil Nadu
The Director, School Education
The Director, Teachers Recruitment Board
M.Duraismamy
J.Sathya Narayana Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
