Dismissed

K.Suganthi v. the State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC22 Nov 2021WA/2358/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ appeal filed under Letters Patent against an order in a writ petition concerning Teacher Eligibility Test qualifications, the court dismissed the appeal as infructuous upon the counsel's submission, noting the prayers had become moot. Consequentially, connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

What did the court decide?

Writ Appeal dismissed as infructuous; connected Miscellaneous Petitions closed.

K.Suganthi Vs the State of Tamilnadu — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 22.11.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY AND THE HON'BLE MR.J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

¶5

W.A.NO.2358 OF 2013 AND M.P.NOS.1 & 2 OF 2013

¶6

K.Suganthi 2. N.Johnson 3. P.Ashok Metha 4. R.Sivakumar 5. V.Ganesan 6. D.Chitra 7. L.Balasubramanian 8. P.Nirmaladevi 9. B.Subakarthiga 10. K.Sangaraj 11. Deivanai 12. M.R.Baskaran 13. M.Periasamy 14. K.Sureshkumar 15. C.Chandrasekaran 16. P.Poongodi 17. C.Loganathan 18. D.Narayanasamy 19. C.Periasamy 20. M.Nallusamy 21. P.Padmavathi 22. C.Malathi 23. N.P.Rajammal 24. R.Panneerselvam .. Appellants vs. 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 9.

¶7

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶8

The Director, School Education, 4^th Floor, EVK Sampath Maaligai, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai – 6. 3. The Director, Teachers Recruitment Board, 4^th Floor, EVK Sampath Maaligai, DPI Compund, College Road, Chennai – 6. .. Respondents

¶9

Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 23.09.2013 made in W.P.No.22807 of 2013 on the file of this Court.

¶10

Prayer in W.P.No.22807 of 2013:

¶11

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the 3rd respondent from applying G.O.Ms. No.181 School Education (C2) Department dt 15.11.2011 to the petitioners and insisting on Teacher Eligibility Test as a minimum qualification for appointment to the posts of Graduate Assistants in Classes VI to X in the schools coming under the Directorate of School Education and Elementary Education and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioners who have completed certificate verification between 12.5.2010 to 15.5.2010 to the post of Graduate Assistants in Classes VI to X in the schools coming under the Directorate of School Education and Elementary Education in the future vacancies without insisting on Teachers Eligibility Test qualification in view of clause 5 of the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) dated 23/08/2010.

¶12

JUDGMENT

¶13

(Judgment of the Court was made by M.DURAISWAMY,J. )

¶14

Ms. C.Uma, learned counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that the prayer sought for in the Writ Appeal has become infructuous, hence, the Writ Appeal may be dismissed as infructuous.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the appellants, the above Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶17

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII)

¶18

//True Copy//

¶19

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶20

¶21

To 1. The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 9. 2. The Director, School Education, 4^th Floor, EVK Sampath Maaligai, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai – 6. 3. The Director, Teachers Recruitment Board, 4^th Floor, EVK Sampath Maaligai, DPI Compund, College Road, Chennai – 6. W.A.No.2358 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2013

¶22

BP(CO) RLP(09/12/2021)

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Suganthi v. the State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Suganthi v. the State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Sridhar Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

The Government of Tamilnadu Vs P.Veerasamy,s/o perumal

Government of Tamil Nadu, Vs a.Balan

The Academic Society of Architects Vs the Union of India

D.Muthu Erulayee Vs the State of Tamilnadu

K.Jayasree Vs the State of Tamilnadu