This Writ Appeal challenged an order declaring the completion of a teacher's probation. The Court declined to intervene, stating the Single Judge's order was valid and that the issue of a missed Government Order regarding minimum marks needed a review petition by the Appellants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.09.2021
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
Writ Appeal No.2311 of 2021 Against W.P.No.34407 of 2019
vs.
R.Thangavel ...Respondent/Petitioner
Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 03.02.2020 passed by this Court in W.P.No.34407 of 2019.
Prayer in W.P.No.34407 of 2019 : To issue a writ of Mandamus, Directing the 2nd Respondent to declare forthwith the completion of the Petitioners probation in the cadre of Physical Education Teacher considering the inordinate delay caused for more than 10 years from the date of selection and appointment in the light of the evaluation of the crucial Karnataka Physical Education Course Certificate by the 1st Respondent completion of the Tamil Written and viva voce tests and the publishing of the same in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette the evaluation of the petitioners S.S.L.C and plus 2 certificates too by the 3rd Respondent apart from re-fixing the petitioners seniority in the light of his selection not only on merits but also on communal reservation giving 15th ranking out of 25 members Selection List Dated 09.06.2008 besides refixing the petitioners Pay-Scale on par with on par with his batch mates disbursing the difference of his pay, increments and all allowances from june 2008.
For Appellants : Mr.K.V.Sajeev Kumar, Government Advocate
J U D G M E N T
(Judgment of the Court delivered by S.VAIDYANATHAN,J.)
The present Writ Appeal has been preferred, challenging the order dated 03.02.2020 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.34407 of 2019.
Hence, this Writ Appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected C.M.P.No.14673 of 2021 is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-IX)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
(vm/aeb)
To
Writ Appeal No.2311 of 2021
AJS(CO) RGA(30/09/2021)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the order of the learned Single Judge declaring the completion of the petitioner's probation is valid in light of examination percentage requirements.
Whether High Court should direct the Single Judge to entertain a review petition regarding government orders on minimum marks criteria.
The Director of School Education and others
R.Thangavel
S. VAIDYANATHAN
A.A. NAKKIRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
