Allowed

P. Sivagamasundari, v. K. Karthikeyan

Madras HC26 Nov 2021TR CMP(MD)/401/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court transferred two family court proceedings from Thanjavur to Vilupuram at the petitioner's request. With the respondent having no objection, the court directed the transferee court to dispose of pending cases within four months.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of proceedings from Family Court Thanjavur to Family Court Vilupuram; directive to decide within four months.

P. Sivagamasundari, Vs K. Karthikeyan — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

TR CMP(MD)Nos.401 & 402 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.11.2021 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA Tr.C.M.P.(MD) Nos.401 & 402 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD) Nos.7824 & 7825 of 2021

¶4

P.Sivagamasundari .. Petitioner in both cases -vsK.Karthikeyan .. Respondent in both cases

¶5

Prayer :- Petitions filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code to withdraw the cases in G.O.P.No.87/2019 and F.C.O.P.No.313 of 2019 from the file of the Family Court, Thanjavur and transfer to the file of the Family Court, Vilupuram and consequently direct the transferee court to deal with the said case in accordance with law.

¶6

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Pitchai Muthu (In both cases) For Respondent : Mr.A.Senthil Kumar (In both cases)

¶7

¶8

COMMON ORDER

¶9

The petitioner/wife, who is the respondent in G.O.P.No.87 of 2019 and F.C.O.P.No.313 of 2019 pending on the file of the Family Court, Thanjavur has filed these transfer petitions seeking transfer of the above proceedings to the file of the Family Court, Vilupuram.

¶10

2.The respondent, who has entered appearance through counsel, has no objection to the transfer being ordered and is accordingly, ordered.

¶11

3.Considering the fact that the proceedings have been pending since the year 2019, the learned Family Judge, Vilupuram is directed to dispose of the petitions within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶12

4.The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed, accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶13

Assistant Registrar (CS-III)

¶14

// True Copy //

¶15

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶16

abr

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

1/2

¶19

TR CMP(MD)Nos.401 & 402 of 2021

¶20

Note:-

¶21

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.

¶22

¶23

1.The Judge, Family Court, Thanjavur. 2.The Judge, Family Court, Vilupuram.

¶24

Tr.C.M.P.(MD) Nos.401 & 402 of 2021 Dated: 26.11.2021

¶25

KMV(CO) GC(07.12.2021) 2P 3C

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

2/2

P. Sivagamasundari, v. K. Karthikeyan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Sivagamasundari, v. K. Karthikeyan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P. Muthu(Died) Vs Chandrasekaran

Kanagalingam, Vs P.a.Manickam

P.Paalanivel Vs M/s.Shrirram City Union Finance Ltd.

Anjugam Vs M.Kaliyan (died)

Shamini Vs Sujan Christo

N.Raja Vs L.N.T.Mahadevan