Allowed

Prabha v. Rama Krishnan

Madras HC23 Apr 2021TR CMP(MD)/102/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order allowed a transfer petition under Section 24 CPC to shift a maintenance domain case from the Family Court, Tirunelveli, to the Subordinate Court, Kulithalai, citing travel hardship for the wife and lack of objection from the husband.

What did the court decide?

Orders withdrawal of the maintenance domain petition from Tirunelveli Family Court and transfer to the Subordinate Court, Kulithalai, and directs disposal on merits.

Prabha Vs Rama Krishnan — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Tr.C.M.P.(MD) No.102 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.04.2021 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN

¶4

Tr.C.M.P.(MD) No.102 of 2021

¶5

and C.M.P.(MD)No.2160 of 2021

¶6

Prabha

¶7

... Petitioner/Respondent

¶8

-vs-

¶9

Rama Krishnan ... Respondent/Petitioner

¶10

PRAYER: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to withdraw the case in H.M.O.P.No.22 of 2021 on the file of the Family Court, Tirunelveli and transfer the same to the file of the Subordinate Court, Kulithalai.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.RM.Sivakumar

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.I.Velpradeep

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

The present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.22 of 2021 on the file of the Family Court, Tirunelveli and transfer the same to the Subordinate Court, Kulithalai.

¶15

2.The respondent/husband has filed before Family Court, Tirunelveli for restitution of conjugal rights.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner/wife submitted that the petitioner is living with her young child without having any income and the petitioner has filed D.V.No. 9 of 2020 before the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kulithalai and the distance Kulithalai and Tirunelveli is about 312 kms. In such circumstances, it is very difficult to travel from Kulithalai to Tirunelveli for attending every hearing in H.M.O.P.No.22 of 2021 on the file of the Family Court, Tirunelveli

¶17

The learned counsel for the respondent has no objection for allowing this petition.

¶18

This Court considered the arguments made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

1/2

¶21

Tr.C.M.P.(MD) No.102 of 2021

¶22

This Court is satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition.

¶23

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, H.M.O.P.No.22 of 2021 is withdrawn from the file of the Family Court, Tirunelveli and transferred to the file of the Subordinate Court, Kulithalai, for disposal as per law. The Judge, Family Court, Tirunelveli, is directed to transmit the papers to the file of the Subordinate Court, Kulithalai, forthwith. The Subordinate Judge, Kulithalai, is directed to dispose H.M.O.P.No.22 of 2021 on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.

¶24

8.In fine, this petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶25

// True Copy //

¶26

msa/CM

¶27

To: 1. The Judge Family Court, Tirunelveli.

¶28

2.The Subordinate Court, Kulithalai. +1 CC to M/s.RM.SIVAKUMAR, Advocate ( SR-17310[F] dated 23/04/2021 )

¶29

Order made in Tr.C.M.P.(MD) No.102 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD)No.2160 of 2021

¶30

Dated: 23.04.2021

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

2/2

Prabha v. Rama Krishnan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabha v. Rama Krishnan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chinnaiah Aasari Vs Neelakandan

Chittu (Died) Vs Ganthimathi

M.Surya Vs D.Saravanan

S.Surya Prabha Vs S.Venkatesan

T.Pandu Vs State Rep by

K.Suvitha Vs S.R.Pearlson Sam Chellakumar