Allowed

M.Surya v. D.Saravanan

Madras HC22 Apr 2021TR CMP(MD)/99/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court allowed a Transfer Application filed under Section 24 CPC. The court transferred a divorce petition from the Principal Sub Judge, Srivilliputhur to the Family Court, Tirunelveli due to the petitioner's residence location and distance constraints.

What did the court decide?

H.M.O.P. No. 153 of 2019 transferred from Principal Sub Judge, Srivilliputhur to Family Court, Tirunelveli; papers to be transmitted forthwith.

M.Surya Vs D.Saravanan — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Tr CMP (MD) No. 99 of 2021

¶2

M.Surya

¶3

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.04.2021

¶4

CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN Tr.C.M.P.(MD) No.99 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD)No.2138 of 2021

... Petitioner

-vs-

D.Saravanan

... Respondent

PRAYER: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to withdraw the case in H.M.O.P.No.153 of 2019 pending before the Principal Sub Judge, Srivilliputhur and transfer the same to the Family Court, Tirunelveli.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Bharathykannan For Respondent : No appearance

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

The present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to withdraw the H.M.O.P.No.153 of 2019 on the file of the Principal Sub Judge, Srivilliputhur and transfer the same to the file of the Family Court, Tirunelveli.

¶13

2.The respondent/husband has filed H.M.O.P.No.153 of 2019 before the Principal Sub Judge, Srivilliputhur for divorce.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner/wife submitted that the petitioner is living with her 6 years old daughter and the distance between Srivilliputhur and Madurai is 150 kms. In such circumstances, it is very difficult to travel from Tirunelveli to Srivilliputhur for attending every hearing in H.M.O.P.No.153 of 2019 on the file of the Principal Sub Judge, Srivilliputhur.

¶15

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the respondent either in person or through counsel.

¶16

This Court considered the arguments made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶17

This Court is satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

¶20

Tr CMP (MD) No. 99 of 2021

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, H.M.O.P.No.153 of 2019 is withdrawn from the file of the Principal Sub Judge, Srivilliputhur, and transferred to the file of the Family Court, Tirunelveli, for disposal as per law. The Principal Sub Judge, Srivilliputhur, is directed to transmit the papers to the file of the Family Court, Tirunelveli, forthwith. The Judge, Family Court, Tirunelveli, is directed to dispose H.M.O.P.No.153 of 2019 on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.

¶22

8.In fine, this petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶23

Assistant Registrar ()

¶24

// True Copy //

¶25

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶26

msa/CM

¶27

To:

¶28

The Principal Sub Judge, Srivilliputhur

¶29

The Judge, Family Court, Tirunelveli.

¶30

Order made in Tr.C.M.P.(MD) No.99 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD)No.2138 of 2021 22.04.2021

¶31

VB (30/04/2021) 2P / 3C

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

M.Surya v. D.Saravanan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Surya v. D.Saravanan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Inbaraj Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

K.Eswari Vs M.Ayyanar

R.Nivedha Vs M.Pazhanikumar

Chinnaiah Aasari Vs Neelakandan

Chittu (Died) Vs Ganthimathi

Sudha Vs Vivek