R.Sampath Kumar v. R.Balakrishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal summarily dismissed for default as the appellant failed to appear and provide instructions despite service of notice.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 26.10.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTIC E R. HEMALATHA
S.A.No.937 of 2009
R.Sampath Kumar ... Appellant/2nd Defendant Vs.
- R.Balakrishnan 2. R.Venkataraman 3. S.Angalakshmi 4. J.Ramathilagam 5. V.Purushotaman ... Respondents/Plaintiff, Defendants 1,3 to 5
Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure against the decree and judgment dated 29.11.2008 in A.S. No.34 of 2008, on the file of the II Additional District Court/Fast Track Court, Salem, in granting preliminary decree in partly allowing the appeal and upholding the decree and judgment dated 30.08.2007 in O.S. No.179 of 1999, on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Salem.
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant reported no instructions for the appellant on 22.09.2021. Hence, the Registry was directed to issue drafted notice to the appellant.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R.Sampath Kumar
- respondent
R.Balakrishnan
- respondent
R.Venkataraman
- respondent
S.Angalakshmi
- respondent
J.Ramathilagam
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court