Perumal v. a. Srinivasan
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal dismissed for default as it became crystal clear to the Court that the appellants are dead and no steps were taken to formally implead their legal heirs.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed for default; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.10.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTIC E R.HEMALATHA
S.A.NO.1673 OF 2008 AND M.P.NO.1 OF 2008
- Perumal
- Chinnasamy
- Ramu ... Appellants
A.Srinivasan ... Respondent
PRAYER:Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure against the decree and judgment dated 28.08.2007 in A.S. No.270 of 2006, on the file of the learned Principal District Court, Puducherry, upholding the decree and judgment dated 29.04.2003 in O.S. No.427 of 1997, on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Court, Pondicherry.
For Respondent : M/s.Mohammed Ifran For Mr.T.S.Baskaran
JUDGMENT
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Perumal, Chinnasamy, Ramu
- respondent
Srinivasan
Coram
ER Hemalatha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court