The High Court at Madras, Chennai Bench dismissed the second appeal for non-prosecution on 15.03.2021, as the appellants did not appear and no representation was filed for more than a year.
Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution with costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:15.03.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A.No.497 of 2009
Prayer:Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 13.04.2007 made in A.S.No.55 of 2006 on the file of the Subordinate Judge of the Nilgiris at Udagamandalam, reversing and setting aside the judgment and decree dated 28.04.2006 made in O.S.No.58 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Udagamandalam.
For Appellants : No appearance For R1 & R2 : Mr.S.Kadarkarai For R3 to R5 : No appearance J U D G M E N T
Counsel for R1 and R2 present.
non-prosecution with costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition, if any, is closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar (CS-VII)
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mfa
To
1. The Subordinate Judge of the Nilgiris at Udagamandalam,
Subordinate Court,
The Nilgiris at Udagamandalam.
2. The District Munsif,
District Munsif Court,
Udagamandalam.
Copy to
The Section Officer,
VR Section,
High Court,
Chennai.
S.A.No.497 of 2009
GSM(CO)
HS(13/07/2021)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the second appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC when appellants remained absent and failed to appear for hearing.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lingiammal
Vasantha
Varalakshmi
E.Sivaraj
E.Paramasivam
Indira Raju
T.Ravindran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
