Dismissed
S.Mujibunisa v. S.Samiyuallah
Madras HCSA/490/2009
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a second appeal for non-prosecution as the appellant was absent and no representation appeared before the court on the hearing date.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution with costs.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶2
DATED: 23.03.2021
¶3
CORAM:
¶4
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
¶5
S.A.No. 490 of 2009
and
M.P.No.1 of 2009
¶6
S.Mujibunisa,
W/o, Mubharakali,
Old No.37/1, New No.68,
Kottaimedu Street,
Kallakurichi,
Villupuram District. ... 4th Defendant/Appellant/Appellant
Vs.
¶7
1. S.Samiyuallah,
S/o, Sayed Kareem,
3, I Street, Lourdhusamy Colony,
Anna Nagar,
Kajamalai,
Tiruchirapalli – 23.
¶8
... Plaintiff/1st Respondent/Respondent
¶9
2. Syed Kareem
¶10
S/o, Syed Kaboor Sahib,
Kottaimedu,
Kallakuruchi & Taluk,
Villupuram District.
¶11
3. Nawabjohn,
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
S.Mujibunisa
- respondent
S.Samiyuallah
- respondent
Syed Kareem
- respondent
Nawabjohn
- respondent
Adawadullah
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court