The High Court at Madras disposed of a second appeal in civil matters where the parties had reached a settlement via the Mediation Centre. The Joint Memo of Compromise was incorporated into the final decree.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :22.03.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTIC E T. RAVINDRAN
S.A.No. 1402 of 2008 and M.P.Nos.1 of 2008 and 1 of 2009
Anand J. Vedanayagam S/o. A. John Joseph ... Appellant/Lr of Sole defendant
Vs.
V. Alexander S/o. P.J.Verghese ... Respondent/Plaintiff
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and decree dated 25.07.2008 in A.S.No.446 of 2006 on the file of II Additional City Civil Judge, Chennai, reversing the judgment and decree dated 08.02.2006 in O.S.No.3907 of 2003 on the file of VI Asst. City Civil Court Chennai.
For Appellant : Mr. T.S. Baskaran
For Respondent : Mr. M. Vivekanandan
JUDGMENT
In this matter, the parties had been referred to the Mediation Centre for exploring the possibilities of settlement between them qua the issues involved between the parties in respect of the subject matter.
the parties before the Mediation Centre. The Joint Memo of Compromise shall form part and parcel of the decree to be passed in the second appeal. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
bga
To
1.The II Additional City Civil Judge, Chennai.
2.The VI Asst. City Civil Judge Chennai.
3.The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.T.Baskaran, Advocate, S.R.No.18268 +1cc to Mr.M.Vivekandandan, Advocate, S.R.No.18530
S.A.No. 1402 of 2008
SSI(CO) CB(12/08/2021)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal can be disposed of based on a compromise agreement reached through mediation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anand J. Vedanayagam
V. Alexander
E T. Ravindran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
