M.Alwar v. Pakkiyam Ammal
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the second appeal as settled out of court based on an representation by the appellant's counsel given via video conference, with no costs awarded.
What did the court decide?
The Second Appeal is dismissed as settled out of Court. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.07.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
S.A.No.457 of 2009 and M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2015 and 1 of 2009
M.Alwar ... Appellant Vs 1.Pakkiyam Ammal 2.Kaliyaperumal Konar
3.Chinnammal
4.Ambujam
5.Pappammal
6.Dharmaraj
7.Selvaraj
8.Jambulingam
9.Sivagamiammal 10.Radhammal ... Respondents
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and Decree of the Learned Additional District Judge/Fast Track Court, Ariyalur dated 26.07.2007 made in A.S.No.111 of 2003 confirming the Judgment and Decree of the Learned District Munsif Court, Jayamkondam dated 28.01.1998 made in O.S.No.365 of 1986.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M. Alwar
- respondent
Pakkiyam Ammal
- respondent
Kaliyaperumal Konar
- respondent
Chinnammal
- respondent
Ambujam
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court