3.In the written statement, the defendant denied all the averments made in the plaint. According to the defendant, one Chinnayya Gounder was the owner of the property measuring an extent of 5.00 Acres in S.No.310/2. But the property was purchased by Angamuthu Gounder. The said Angamuthu Gounder, on 16.11.1942 sold 2.5 Acrse of land out of the total extent of 5.00 Acres in S.No.310/2 to Thandavaraya Gounder @ Mottai Thalayan S/o. Chinnayya Gounder. The said Thandavaraya Gounder became the owner of the property and he was in possession and enjoyment of the same. Poongavana Gounder had two wives. Through his first wife, he had one son namely Murugesan. When the said Murugesan was a small child, his mother died. After the death of the first wife, Poongavana Gounder married one Bagyammal as second wife. Immediately after the second marriage, within a short time, Poongavana Gounder died and no child was born to Bagyammal. Therefore, it is false to state that Subramani was born to Poongavana Gounder and Bagyammal and the plaintiff is the wife of Subramani is also denied. After the death of Murugasan's mother, the first wife of Poongavana Gounder, he was adopted by Thandavaraya Gounder. After the death of Thandavaraya Gounder, his sons namely, Mani and Govindasamy and the adopted son Murugesan have divided the properties into three shares. Thus, all the three were entitled to 0.60 cents of land in S.No.310/2. The defendant as a wife of Murugesan derived title to 0.60 cents of land in S.No.310/2 which was subsequently sub-divided as S.No.310/2C and joint patta was also issued in the name of the defendant vide Patta No.313. Thus, she is the absolute owner of the property measuring 0.60 Cents in S.No.310/2C and the plaintiff is not entitled to any share in
