V.Boopathy Ramalingam(Died), v. v.Venkataraju
Case brief
What is this about?
The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code was withdrawn by the appellant, who stated that parties had arrived at a partition. Consequently, the appellate court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.09.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
S.A.No.1247 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013
- V.Boopathy Ramalingam (Died)
- B.Dhanalakshmi
- B.Krishnakumar
- B. Jayanthi ...Appellant/Legal heirs of the 2nd Defendant
(Appellants 2 to 4 brought on record as legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant viz., V.Boopathy Ramalingam vide Court order dated 21.09.2021 made in C.M.P.No.13972, 13974 and 13976 of 2020 in S.A.No.1247 of 2012
Vs.
- V.Venkataraju 2. V.Ramakrishnan @ Devaraj
Parties & counsel
- appellant
V.Boopathy Ramalingam (Died) and others
- respondent
V.Venkataraju and others
Coram
M. Govindaraj
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court