Gandhimathi v. Somasundaram
Case brief
What is this about?
The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code was dismissed as withdrawn, based on an affidavit filed by the appellant indicating lack of interest in prosecuting the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed as withdrawn; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.11.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
SECOND APPEAL NO.323 OF 2012
AND M.P.NO.1 OF 2012
Gandhimathi ...Appellant / 1st Defendant
/versus/
1.Somasundaram
2.Duraisamy ...Respondents / 2nd Plaintiff and 2nd Defendant
Prayer : Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 06.07.2011 in A.S.No.7 of 2011 on the file of the District Court, Nagapattinam, confirming the judgment and decree dated 05.07.2010 in O.S.No.31 of 2006 on the file of the principal Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai.
Learned counsel Mr.S.Sounthar appeared for the appellant through video conferencing and drew my attention to paragraph No.2 of the affidavit filed by the appellant that he is not interested in prosecuting the above second appeal and the second appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. Recording the same, the second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. The connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Gandhimathi
- respondent
1.Somasundaram
- respondent
2.Duraisamy
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court