The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code was formerly posted for dismissal due to non-appearance of the appellants. On the date of hearing, no representation was filed, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for default without costs.
Second Appeal dismissed for default; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.09.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA
S.A. NO.186 OF 2010
1.B.Loganathan
2.B.Kumar ... Appellants
..Vs..
P.Subramani ... Respondent
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 17.07.2009 in A.S.No.312 of 2008 on the file of II Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, reversing the decree and judgment dated 14.02.2008 in O.S.No.6724/2005 on the file of the XI Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.
JUDGMENT
When the second appeal came up for hearing on 07.09.2021, there was no representation for the appellants and hence was directed to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal' on 08.09.2021. Even today, i.e., 08.09.2021 there is no representation for the appellants. The learned counsel for the Respondent is present.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
nr/mtl
To
S.A.N o.186 of 2010
SRA (CO) CS/29/09/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
B. Loganathan
B. Kumar
P. Subramani
R. Hemalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
