Rathinam v. Sivabakkiam
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal dismissed for default as the appellant failed to appear or instruct counsel on the scheduled hearing date.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.09.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
S.A. No. 1039 of 2008
Rathinam ...Appellant/1st Respondent/Plaintiff
..Vs..
- Sivabakkiam 2. Kothandaraman 3. Lakshmi Priya 4. Nithya 5. Praseetha 6. Pushpa @ Pushparani ...Respondents 1 to 6/Appellants 1 to 6/Defendants 1 to 6 7. Gangayammal @ Rangammal @ Ponniammal 8. Krishnasamy ...Respondents 7&8/Appellants 6&7/Defendants 14&16 9. Jothi 10. Rajasekhar 11. Suguna 12. Desigamani 13. Amaravathi 14. Sathiskumar ...Respondents 9 to 14/Respondents 2 to 7/Defendants 7 to 2 15. Subadra ...Respondent 15/8th Respondent/13th Defendant 16. Rukmani 17. Ramakrishnan 18. Rani ...Respondents 16 to 18/ Respondents 10 to 12 / Defendants 17 to 19 19. P.G.Sundararaj 20. Kalaiselvi 21. Umapathy 22. Karuna @ Kanthimathi ... Respondents 19 to 22/Respondents 13 to 16
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 22.11.2007 passed in A.S. No.19 of 2007 on the file of Additional District Judge - Fast Track Court No.4, Bhavani, reversing the decree and judgement dated 20.10.2004 in O.S.No. 533 of 2004 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif Court, Bhavani.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rathinam
- respondent
Sivabakkiam
- respondent
Kothandaraman
- respondent
Lakshmi Priya
- respondent
Nithya
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court