R.Selvaraju v. Thilagavathi
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the second appeal for non-prosecution as the appellant was absent without representation despite being listed twice.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.03.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTIC E T. RAVINDRAN
S.A.No. 1189 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009
R. Selvaraju,S/o. Rangan ... Appellant
Vs.
Thilagavathi, W/o. Azhwar ... Respondent
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 07.08.2009 passed in A.S.No.37/2009, on the file of Principal District Judge, Villupuram, whereby modifying the judgment and decree dated 23.04.2008 passed by the Additional District Munsif, Villupuram in O.S.No.405/2004.
JUDGMENT
It could be seen from the notes paper that there has been no representation for the appellant for many hearings, accordingly, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption "for dismissal" today.
- Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant, despite the matter being called twice. The appellant called, absent. Counsel for the respondent present.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R. Selvaraju
- respondent
Thilagavathi
Coram
E. T. Ravindran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court