Mrs Razia Begum v. Amerkhan
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a short order dismissing a Second Appeal as infructuous without engaging substantive legal arguments.
What did the court decide?
The Second Appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.06.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA
S.A.No.1050 of 2008
Razia Begum
1.Ammerkhan 2.Kuttan Nair 3.Parvathy
Prayer:
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgement and Decree passed in A.S.No.365 of 2003 dated 31.01.2005 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.IV, Madras confirming the Judgement and Decree in O.S.No.5371 of 1987 dated 14.01.2003 on the file of XII Assistant Judge City Civil Court, Madras.
The learned counsel for the appellant would submit that nothing survives for consideration in the above Second Appeal and that the same may be dismissed as infructuous. The Second Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Sub Assistant Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Razia Begum
- respondent
1.Ammerkhan 2.Kuttan Nair 3.Parvathy
Coram
P.T. ASHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court