Dismissed

Viswakarma Kammalar v. Tm Subramania Naicker(Died)

Madras HC21 Jun 2021SA/917/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Second Appeal concerning property rights filed by Viswakarma Chatram Trust was dismissed. The High Court confirmed the judgment and decree of the Principal Sub Judge regarding the dispute, holding no grounds for interference found in the lower appellate court's decision.

What did the court decide?

The Second Appeal was dismissed; the judgment and decree of the Principal Sub Judge in A.S.No.29 of 2007 were confirmed. No costs awarded to the appellant.

Viswakarma Kammalar Vs Tm Subramania Naicker(Died) — Specific Performance | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

MONDAY THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA

¶5

S.A.No.917 of 2009

¶6

Viswakarma (Kammalar) Chatram Trust, Thiruporur, Repd by its President, Paramasiva Achari, Having office at No.122 Karthikeayapuram, Road, Periyar Nagar, Chennai - 82

¶7

...Appellant/1^st Defendant/Plaintiff

¶8

Vs.

¶9

T.M. Subramania Naickar (Died) ...Respondent/Appellant/1^st Defendant

¶10

The Sub- Registrar, Thiruporur. ...Respondent/2^nd Defendant/2^nd Defendant

¶11

S. Padmavathy

¶12

Udayashanker 5. Anbalagan 6. Mathiyalagan 7. Chitibabu 8. Baskar 9. Jeya 10. Saraswathi ...Respondents

¶13

R3 to R10 brought on record as LRS of the Deceased R1 Viz., T.M. Subramani Naicker vide order of court dated 05.11.2019 made in C.M.P.No.1 &2/2014 in S.A.No.917/2009 (AQJ)

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

PRAYER: Appeal against the decree of the Principal Sub Judge, Chengalpattu made in A.S.No.29 of 2007, dated 29.04.2009 preferred against the decree of the Court of the District Munsif, Chengalpattu in O.S.No.168 of 2000 dated 30.11.2006.

¶16

Decree : This Second Appeal coming on for hearing on this day upon perusing the grounds of appeal the judgment and decrees of the Lower Appellate Court and the court of First isntance and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. V. Raghavachari for the Appellant and of Ms. Nilophar for 3,5,6,7,9 and 10^th Respondents, Respondents 1 and 4 are died, 8^th Respondent notice not ready, doth order and decree as follows:

¶17

that the judgment and decree in A.S.No.29 of 2007, on the file of the Principal Sub Judge, Chengalpattu dated 29.04.2009 be and hereby is confirmed, and this Second Appeal is dismissed;

¶18

that there be no costs in this Second Appeal.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Deputy Registrar(Spl.Cell.CJ Conf)

¶21

//True copy//

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

To,

¶24

The Principal Sub Judge, Chengalpattu

¶25

The District Munsif, Chengalpattu

¶26

The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

¶27

+1cc to M/s.R.Meenal, Advocate SR.No.28578

¶28

+1cc to Mr.V. Raghavachari, Advocate SR.No.28470

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

DATED : 21/06/2021 DECREE :

¶31

S.A.No.917 of 2009

¶32

Dismissed the Second Appeal preferred agains the judgment and decree of the Principal Sub Judge, Chengalpattu, dated 29.04.2009 made in A.S.No.29 of 2007, reversing the judgment and decree in O.S.No.168 of 2000 on the file of District Munsif, Chengalpattu dated 30.11.2006 and etc., as sated therein.

¶33

RLD(CO) GMY(08/11/2021)

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Viswakarma Kammalar v. Tm Subramania Naicker(Died)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Viswakarma Kammalar v. Tm Subramania Naicker(Died)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Ramasamy Vs Rangan

State Bank of Hyderabad Vs H.v.Viswasvaran

Map Rahmathullah Vs Sri Sabanayagar Uchalakala

Jayachandran Vs Govindasamy

Gulf Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs M/S.Prakash Paracel Services

A.M.Kolandaivelu Vs N.Varadharajaperumal