In this second appeal filed under Section 100 of the CPC, 1908, the appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The High Court granted permission, dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, and closed the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition.
Permission to withdraw the second appeal granted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; connected CMP closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.09.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
S.A.No.1090 of 2005 and C.M.P. No. 14942 of 2005
P. Mahimainathan ... Appellant/Appellant/Plaintiff
vs.
... Respondents/Respondents/Defendants
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the C.P.C., 1908 against the decree and Judgment dated 29.04.20005 in A.S. No 61 of 2003 on the file of District Court, Tiruvannamalai, confirming the Decree and Judgement dated 07.08.2003 in O.S. No. 288 of 2001 on the file of Additional District Munsif Court, Tiruvannamalai.
For Appellant : Ms.Veena Suresh For R2 : Ms.Swadhi Subramanium JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this second appeal and also undertook to file a Memo to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
nr
To
1.The District Judge, Tiruvannamalai.
S.A.No.1090 of 2005
NR(CO) CT(27/09/2021)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Mahimainathan
1. Savarimuthu
2. Chinnappan @ Alphones
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
