S.Prasanna v. nil
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners filed an original petition for a succession certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act. The Court, on the merits, dismissed the petition as the petitioners voluntarily withdrew the original petition after securities were transferred to them. Registry directed fee refund.
What did the court decide?
Original Petition dismissed as withdrawn. Duty fee refunded to first petitioner.
What the court decided
O.P.No.666 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.12.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Original Petition No.666 of 2020
1.S.Prasanna
2.Mrs.S.Rajeswari
3.S.Ramji
4.S.Krishnaji
5.S.Balaji
.... Petitioners
Petition filed under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 read with Order XXV Rule 6 of the Madras High Court Original Side Rules, to grant succession certificate in favour of the petitioners with power to collect the debts and to receive the interest specified in the Schedule.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Prasanna
- respondent
S.Rajeswari
- respondent
S.Ramji
- respondent
S.Krishnaji
- respondent
S.Balaji
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court