Mrs.Gomathy Ammal v. Senthilvel
Case brief
What is this about?
Application allowed appointing Advocate Commissioner to examine aged petitioner at her residence; warrants issued for evidence recording by next hearing.
What did the court decide?
Appointment of Mr.V. Lokesh Kumar as Advocate Commissioner to examine the petitioner at her residence with a remuneration of Rs.10,000/-.
What the court decided
A. No.3713 of 2021 in O.P. No.920 of 2019
A. No.3713 of 2021
in O.P. No.920 of 2019
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
Application No.3713 of 2021 has been filed by the petitioner seeking for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to examine the petitioner in chief and cross in O.P. No.920 of 2019 at the residence of the petitioner viz., No.12/2, First Avenue, Sasthri Nagar, Adyar, Chennai - 600 020.
- The applicant / petitioner is more than eighty years old and due to her old age she has expressed her difficulty to come to this Court and let in evidence and only in those circumstances, she has filed this application seeking for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner.
- No prejudice will be caused to the respondents, if this application is allowed as prayed for. Accordingly, Mr.V. Lokesh Kumar, Advocate is appointed as learned Advocate Commissioner, F/187, Bharathidasan Street, MMDA Colony, Arumbakkam, Chennai – 600 106 (Mobile No.9789912168) to record the evidence of the petitioner in her residence at No.12/2, First Avenue, Sasthri Nagar, Adyar, Chennai - 600 020 and submit a report before this Court on the next hearing date.
- The learned Advocate Commissioner shall be paid a remuneration of Rs.10,000/- as his remuneration for executing this order.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to examine the petitioner due to her age.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Petitioner
Coram
Abdul Quddose
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court