Allowed

Mrs.S.Sujatha, W/o. S.Chandrasekaran, v. M/s.Ramani Realtors Pvt.,Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director

Madras HC12 Mar 2021OP/554/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Original Petitions 554 and 555 of 2020, the High Court of Madras appointed an arbitrator for disputes arising from a Construction Agreement between the petitioners and respondent under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, recognizing no objection from parties.

What did the court decide?

Greenways Road, Chennai appointed as Arbitrator; proceedings under Madras High Court Arbitration Centre; respondent to raise validity objections.

Mrs.S.Sujatha, W/o. S.Chandrasekaran, Vs M/s.Ramani Realtors… — Arbitration | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

OP.Nos.554 and 555 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 12.03.2021

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA

¶6

OP.Nos.554 and 555 of 2020
Mrs. S. Sujatha
...Petitioner in OP.No.554 of 2020
DR. M. Gopalaswamy
...Petitioner in OP.No.555 of 2020
Vs
Ramani Realtors Pvt., Ltd.,
Represented by its Managing Director,
Mr. Subramanian Venkataraman,
Having its Registered Office at
No.5, Lakshmipuram, Royapettah,
Chennai- 600 014.
... Respondent in
OP.Nos.554 and 555 of 2020

¶7

Prayer in 554 and 555 of 2020: Petitions filed under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 praying to appoint an Arbitrator in terms of the aforesaid Construction Agreement dated 09.09.2015 entered into between the petitioner and the respondent to resolve the dispute.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr. P. Vasanthakumar Visweswaran
For Respondent : Mr. I. Abulal Mohd. Abdullah

¶9

1/4

¶10

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶11

OP.Nos.554 and 555 of 2020

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

The above petitions are filed to appoint an Arbitrator in terms of the aforesaid Construction Agreement dated 09.09.2015 entered into

¶14

between the petitioner and the respondent to resolve the dispute.

¶15

The parties have no objection to an arbitrator being appointed

¶16

to resolve the disputes between the parties.

¶17

The learned counsel for the respondent is directed to produce

¶18

his affidavit of undertaking along with photographs by 17.03.2021.

¶19

Greenways Road, Chennai- 600 028, Phone- 24954004,, is appointed as the Arbitrator to enter upon reference and adjudicate the disputes

¶20

inter se the parties.

¶21

ii) The learned Arbitrator may, after issuing notice to the parties

¶22

and upon hearing them, pass an award as expeditiously as possible,

¶23

2/4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶25

OP.Nos.554 and 555 of 2020

¶26

preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of the order. It is open to the respondent to raise all legal objections as to the validity of contract.

¶27

iii) The learned Arbitrator is at liberty to fix his remuneration and

¶28

other incidental expenses as per law.

¶29

iv) The proceedings may be conducted under the aegis of the Madras High Court Arbitration Centre and in accordance with the Madras High Court Arbitration Rules.

¶30

The Original Petitions are, accordingly, allowed, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

¶31

12.03.2021 mrn

¶32

Index : Yes/No Speaking order/non-speaking order

¶33

3/4

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶35

OP.Nos.554 and 555 of 2020

¶36

P.T.ASHA, J.

¶37

mrn

¶38

To, The Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Ravichandrabaabu, (Retd.), 39, Greenways Road, Chennai- 600 028, Phone- 24954004

¶39

OP.Nos.554 and 555 of 2020

¶40

12.03.2021

¶41

4/4

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Mrs.S.Sujatha, W/o. S.Chandrasekaran, v. M/s.Ramani Realtors Pvt.,Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs.S.Sujatha, W/o. S.Chandrasekaran, v. M/s.Ramani Realtors Pvt.,Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhavesh N.Saiya Vs Kalyanji K Saiya

Kanagamoney Diaraj (Died) 1.C.P.DAVID and 3 Others Vs a.Soundararajan and 6 others

G.Karthik S/O.Late v.Ganapathy Vs Shyam Krishna Agarwal

T. Raghava Vs Mr. Rajendran

S.Gopinath Alias Arputharaj Vs

Mr.Selvakumar and another Vs M/s Amar Prakaash Developers Private Limited