An application to rectify a typo in the description of a flat number in an order was allowed. The court modified the order to reflect the correct door/gate number.
The order was modified to rectify the error regarding the flat number description.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No. 1065 of 2021 in A.No. 9360 of 2019
A.No. 1065 of 2021 in A.No. 9360 of 2019
P.T. ASHA, J.
The above application has been filed for rectifying the inadvertent error that has been crept in with reference to the description of the flat namely its Door Number, instead of No.G-229, the same has been referred as G-299 and therefore the said error has been carried over in the order. In schedule C of the Agreement of Project Promotion and Construction which is registered as document No. 3555 of 2016, the flat number has been described as G-299. Consequently, the order shall be modified to that extent. The application is ordered.
12.03.2021
mrn
1/2
A.No. 1065 of 2021 in A.No. 9360 of 2019
P.T.ASHA, J.
mrn
A.No. 1065 of 2021 in A.No. 9360 of 2019
24.03.2021
2/2
Applicant
P.T. A. SHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
