Champa Bai v. Nil
Case brief
What is this about?
Seven petitioners, being legal heirs of the deceased S. Parasmal Kothari, sought a succession certificate for securities in favour of the sixth petitioner. The court allowed the petition, granting the certificate based on evidence and consent of other heirs.
What did the court decide?
Original Petition (OP No.309 of 2021) allowed; succession certificate granted in favour of petitioner No.6.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
(TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION)
MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
O.P.No.309 of 2021
In the matter of the Indian Succession Act No.XXXIX of 1925 and In the matter of securities of Mr.S.Parasmal Kothari alias S.P.Kothari (deceased)
1. CHAMPA BAI
W/o.Late Mr.S.Parasmal Kothari Alias S.P.Kothari, No.17/26, Pillaiyar Koil Street, Vadapalani, Chennai-600 026, Tamil Nadu
- P.SAMPATH RAJ KOTHARI S/o.Late Mr.S.Parasmal Kothari, No.17/26, Pillaiyar Koil Street, Vadapalani, Chennai-600 026, Tamil Nadu
- KAMAL CHAND KOTHARI S/o.Late Mr.S.Parasmal Kothari, No.17/26, Pillaiyar Koil Street, Vadapalani, Chennai-600 026, Tamil Nadu
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether succession certificate should be granted to the petitioner No.6 as per the petition
Whether consent of other legal heirs is sufficient for transfer of securities to the petitioner No.6
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Champa Bai
- petitioner
P. Sampath Raj Kothari
- petitioner
Kamal Chand Kothari
- petitioner
Kusumlatha
- petitioner
P. Roopraj Kothari
- petitioner
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court