Disposed

M/S Vectone India Mobile Services Private Limited v. Mr.P.S.Mohan and 4 others

Madras HC22 Nov 2021A/2166/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Responding to an application by the defendant seeking to impound a lease deed filed by plaintiffs, the Court held that the admissibility issue must be determined after the trial of the main suit.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the applicant/defendant to raise the issue regarding the admissibility of the lease deed in the written statement to be filed in the main suit.

M/S Vectone India Mobile Services Private… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)

¶4

MONDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

A.No.2166 Of 2021

¶7

in C.S.NO.93 Of 2021

¶8

C.S.No.93 of 2021:-

¶9

1.Mr.P.S.Mohan, S/o.Late.P.N.Shanmugham,

¶10

2.Mr.P.S.Saravanan, S/o.Late.P.N.Shanmugham, 1 & 2 Are Residing At: G-61, 12^th Street, Anna Nagar, Chennai – 600 102.

¶11

3.Mr.N.Muthukrishnan,

¶12

S/o.Late Mr.M.Natarajan,

¶13

4.Ms.Uma Natarajan, D/o.Late Mr.M.Natarajan,

¶14

5.Mr.N.Balamuthukumaran, S/o.Late Mr.M.Natarajan, 3,4 & 5 Are Residing At: No.3A,Shanthi Colony, No.3, Thillaiyadi Valliammai Street, Saligramam,Chennai – 600 093. ...Plaintiffs

¶15

Vs.

¶16

M/s.Vectone India Mobile Services Private Limited, Having its registered office at https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ “Sai Sadan” TS.No.125 (North Phase) SIDCO Thiru.Vi.Ka.Industrial Estate, Ekkaduthangal,

¶17

¶18

Chennai – 600 032. Rep by its Managing Director.

¶19

...Defendant

¶20

A.No.2166 of 2021:-

¶21

M/s.Vectone India Mobile Services Private Limited, Having its registered office at “Sai Sadan” TS.No.125 (North Phase) SIDCO Thiru.Vi.Ka.Industrial Estate, Ekkaduthangal, Chennai – 600 032. Rep by its Managing Director.

¶22

...Applicant/Defendant

¶23

Vs.

¶24

1.Mr.P.S.Mohan, S/o.Late.P.N.Shanmugham,

¶25

2.Mr.P.S.Saravanan, S/o.Late.P.N.Shanmugham, 1 & 2 Are Residing At: G-61, 12^th Street, Anna Nagar, Chennai – 600 102.

¶26

3.Mr.N.Muthukrishnan,

¶27

S/o.Late Mr.M.Natarajan,

¶28

4.Ms.Uma Natarajan, D/o.Late Mr.M.Natarajan,

¶29

5.Mr.N.Balamuthukumaran, S/o.Late Mr.M.Natarajan, 3,4 & 5 Are Residing At: No.3A,Shanthi Colony, No.3, Thillaiyadi Valliammai Street, Saligramam,Chennai – 600 093. ...Respondents/Plaintiffs

¶30

Application Praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to order that

¶31

the Lease Deed dated 12.07.2018 is inadmissible as evidence and further https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

impound the same.

¶33

¶34

This Application coming on this day before this Court for hearing, the

¶35

Court made the following order:

¶36

This application has been filed by the defendant seeking for an order from this Court that the lease deed dated 12.07.2018 filed by the plaintiffs along with the plaint in CS.No.93 of 2021 is not admissible in evidence and consequently impound the said document.

¶37

This court is of the considered view that the relief sought for by the learned counsel for the applicant/defendant in this application can be decided only after trial in the main suit.

¶38

Without prejudice to the rights of the applicant/defendant to raise

¶39

the issue that is raised in A.No.2166 of 2021, this application is disposed of by granting liberty to the applicant/defendant to raise the issue that is raised

¶40

in A.No.2166 of 2021 in the written statement to be filed by the defendant in CS.No.93 of 2021.

¶41

Sd./-A.Q.J 22.11.2021 //Certified to be true copy//

¶42

Dated at Madras this the day of 2021.

¶43

COURT OFFICER(O.S.)

¶44

From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

¶45

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶46

JJ 01/12/2021

M/S Vectone India Mobile Services Private Limited v. Mr.P.S.Mohan and 4 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Vectone India Mobile Services Private Limited v. Mr.P.S.Mohan and 4 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Mohandoss Vs Nil

R.Nehrudasan, Vs K.Ravichandran

R.Gopinath Vs S.Nithya Devi

S.Saroja Vs K.Vasantha

Champa Bai Vs Nil

Minors of Suryalakshmi Vs Mr.Murthy