Disposed

P.Chanadrasekar v. State Rep by

Madras HC28 Jul 2021HCP/1140/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court closed the habeas corpus petition regarding missing daughter and grandchild. It directed police to monitor the ongoing criminal investigation and produce the missing persons before the Magistrate upon recovery with intimation to the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Petition closed; direction to Assistant Commissioner of Police to monitor investigation, inform petitioner and produce missing persons before Magistrate when secured.

P.Chanadrasekar Vs State Rep by — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 28.07.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN

¶5

H.C.P.NO.1140 OF 2021

Chandrasekar

.. Petitioner

Vs.

The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Tiruppur City,

¶10

Tiruppur District.

¶11

The Inspector of Police, Velampalayam Police Station,

¶12

Tiruppur City,

¶13

Tiruppur District. (Crime No.282 of 2021) .. Respondents

¶14

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus directing the 2^nd respondents for the produce of the petitioner's daughter Vaishya Lakshmi D/o.P.Chandrasekar aged about 24 years and minor Rakshan, son of Jenice Ajith, aged about 2 ½ years, before this Court and set them at liberty.

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This habeas corpus petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondents to produce the petitioner's daughter Vaishya Lakshmi, aged about 24 years and minor Rakshan, son of Jenice Ajith, aged about 2 ½ years, before this Court and set them at liberty.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

It is the case of the petitioner that his daughter Vaishya Lakshmi was married to Jenice Ajith, through whom, she has a child Rakshan, aged about 2 ½ years. It is the further case of the petitioner that his daughter Vaishya Lakshmi and Rakshan went missing from 31.03.2021 by leaving a cryptic message in the phone that she is going with a known person.

¶19

On instructions, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that on a complaint given by the petitioner, a case in Velampalayam Police Station Crime No.282 of 2021 was registered on 01.04.2021 for 'woman and boy missing' and investigation is in progress.

¶20

Recording the same, this habeas corpus petition stands closed with a direction to the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Tiruppur North Sub-division, to monitor the investigation in Velampalayam Police Station Crime No.282 of 2021 and keep the petitioner informed of the developments, if any. As and when Vaishya Lakshmi, aged about 24 years and Rakshan, aged about 2 ½ years, are secured, they shall be produced before the Judicial Magistrate Court No.III, Tiruppur, under intimation to the petitioner. On such production, the learned Magistrate shall pass appropriate orders with regard to custody in accordance with law.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

Assistant Registrar(CS VI)

¶23

//True Copy//

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶25

nsd

¶26

¶27

The Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tiruppur.

¶28

The Assistanct Commissioner of Police, Tiruppur North Sub-Division.

¶29

The Commissioner of Police,

¶30

Office of the Commissioner of Police,

¶31

Tiruppur City,

¶32

Tiruppur District.

¶33

The Inspector of Police,

¶34

Velampalayam Police Station,

¶35

Tiruppur City, Tiruppur District.

¶36

The Public Prosecutor,

¶37

Madras High Court,

¶38

Chennai – 600 104.

¶39

H.C.P.No.1140 of 2021

¶40

GPL(CO)

¶41

HS(23/08/2021)

¶42

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Chanadrasekar v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Chanadrasekar v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rubeka Sathya Kumar Vs the Commissioner of Police

Tmt.Sathya Vs the Secretary to Government

Ganesan Vs the Secretary to the Government

Chinnaraj @ Udayan Vs State Represented by

Murugasamy Vs State Rep.by

Kasinathan Vs State Rep by