Murugasamy v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
The Criminal Appeal was closed as abated because the appellant died in prison and legal heirs did not prosecute the appeal under Section 394(2) Cr.P.C.
What did the court decide?
Criminal Appeal and connected Crl.M.P. closed as abated.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.07.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN
Crl.A.No.607 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.No.13200 of 2019
Murugasamy ..Appellant/Accused
Vs.
State represented by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Udumalpet, Tiruppur District. (Crime No.4 of 2018)
..Respondent/Complainant
Criminal Appeal filed under Sections 374 Cr.P.C. against the judgment and order dated 29.04.2019 passed in Spl.S.C.No.51 of 2018 on the file of the Magalir Neethimandram, (Fast Track Mahila Court), Tiruppur and set aside the same.
For Appellant : Mr.N.Umapathi
JUDGMENT
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Murugasamy
- respondent
State represented by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Udumalpet
Coram
P.N. PRAKASH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court