M.v.R.S.Prasad v. Manickam Narayanan
Case brief
What is this about?
Suit for declaration and injunction regarding copyright assignment settled out of court. Court dismissed the suit as settled upon plaintiff's statement.
What did the court decide?
Suit dismissed as settled out of court. No costs.
What the court decided
C.S.No.914 of 2003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 24.06.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
C.S.No.914 of 2003
1.M.V.R.S.Prasad
2.S.Ramesh Babu ...Plaintiffs
Vs.
1.Manickam Narayanan
Proprietor
th
7 Channel Communications,
No.121, Radhakrishna Salai,
Chennai – 600 004.
2.V.Vijayakumar Varma
Proprietor
Vijaya Maruthi Creatives,
Flat No.1, Shilpa Apartments,
Erramanzil Colony,
Hyderabad – 560 082.
3.Ramoji Rao
Proprietor
Ushakiron Movies,
1-10-76, Fair Field,
Begumpet, Hyderabad – 500 016.
4.Prasad Film Laboratories,
No.22, Arunachalam Road,
Saligramam, Chennai – 600 093. ...Defendants
1/4
C.S.No.914 of 2003 Prayer: Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 & 2 of the Original Side Rules r/w. Order VII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure and Sections, 55, 56, 60 & 62 of the Copyrights Act, 1957, praying as follows:-
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.V.R.S. Prasad
- respondent
Manickam Narayanan
- respondent
Ramoji Rao
- respondent
Prasad Film Laboratories
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court