Contempt petition filed to punish respondents for alleged willful disobedience of a writ order rejected petitioners' claims for nurse appointment under a specific government order judgment closed.
Contempt petition closed; no costs; right to challenge rejections available to petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Contempt Petition No.79 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.06.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
Contempt Petition No.79 of 2021 in
W.P.No.8386 of 2020
1.K.Nivedha,
184/16(A)Saraswathi Garden, Margabandhu Street, Nagammal Thottam, Peramanoor – 636 007, Salem
2.P.Suganya, No.5, Kudi Street, Nallur Post, N Kadampalayam, Paramathy Velur, Namakkal
3.P.Hemalatha,
No.1/91, Kondichetty Patty, Namakkal
4.M.Mariyammal, 4/63, VeerappamPalayam, Kannambapatti Village, Edappadi, Salem
5.S.Uma,
3/193, Ummaiyan Patti Village, Thoppur, Dharmapuri ...Petitioners Vs.
1.Dr.J.Radhakrishnan IAS
Principal Secretary to Goverment, The State of Tamil Nadu, Health and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 9.
2.Dr.A.Chandranathan, M.D.,
The Director of Medical and Rural Health Services,
Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
1/3
Contempt Petition No.79 of 2021
3.Dr.A.Edwin Joe, MD, BL.,
The Director of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai – 10.
...Respondents
Prayer: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeking to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 18.06.2020 in Writ Petition No.8386 of 2020.
For Petitioners : Mr.Kumar
For Respondents : No Appearance
The copy of the order dated 25.02.2021 passed by the Director of
Medical and Rural Health Services, Chennai – 6 has been placed before me by the Government counsel.
2.It is seen from the said order that the Government had passed G.O.MS.No.29 of 2012 dated 18.01.2012, providing for a procedure for recruitment of Staff Nurses in Government Hospitals.
3.In view of the same, the claim of the petitioners for appointment
has been rejected. Accordingly, this contempt petition is closed. No costs. Leaving it open to the petitioners to challenge the said order.
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) kkn
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2021.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
2/3
Contempt Petition No.79 of 2021
GS/14/07/2021
To:-
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be allowed based on the rejection of appointment claims under a government order?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
K.Nivedha and others
Dr.J.Radhakrishnan and others
R.Subramanian
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
