Allowed

M.Akshaya v. M.Kalai Arasi

Madras HC28 Oct 2021CRP(MD)/1503/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This revision petition sought to strike off DVOP proceedings insofar as the petitioner was involved. The Court allowed the petition based on the respondents' submission regarding the Social Welfare Officer's report and set aside the lower court's order.

What did the court decide?

The order of the Additional Mahila Judge, Madurai in DVOP No.13 of 2021 is set aside in respect of the petitioner alone.

M.Akshaya Vs M.Kalai Arasi — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

C.R.P(MD)No. 1503 of 2021

¶2

M.Akshaya

¶3

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶4

DATED: 28.10.2021

¶5

CORAM

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA C.R.P(PD)(MD) No. 1503 of 2021

¶7

and CMP(MD) No.8282 of 2021

¶8

...Petitioner/Respondent 8 Vs.

¶9

M. Kalaiarasi

¶10

Minor. Rekshika

¶11

(Rep. by 1st respondent)

¶12

...Respondents/Complainants

¶13

PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to strike of the proceedings that has been initiated by the respondents under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 in DVOP No. 13 of 2021 before the learned Additional Mahila Judge, Madurai in so far as the petitioner is concerned.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Anand For Respondents : Mr.S.Satheeskumar

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

The Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the eighth respondent seeking to call for the entire records pertaining to the proceedings initiated by the learned Additional Mahila Judge, Madurai in DVOP NO. 13 of 2021 and strike off the same in so far as the petitioner is concerned

¶17

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the respondents filed a memo stating that he has no objection in allowing the revision petition in so far as the present petitioner alone is concerned based on the report of the Social Welfare Officer.

¶18

Recording the same, the Civil Revision Petition stands allowed and the order passed by the learned Additional Mahila Judge, Madurai in DVOP No.13 of 2021 stands set aside in respect of the present petitioner alone. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Assistant Registrar (W)

¶21

// True Copy //

¶22

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶23

aav

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

1/2

¶26

C.R.P(MD)No. 1503 of 2021

¶27

Note In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶28

¶29

The Additional Mahila Judge, Madurai

¶30

+2 CC to M/s.S.SATHEESH KUMAR, Advocate ( SR-33471[F] dated 01/11/2021 )

¶31

C.R.P(PD)(MD) No. 1503 of 2021 and CMP(MD) No.8282 of 2021 28.10.2021

¶32

NA(CO)

¶33

KB(12.11.2021) 2P 4C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

2/2

M.Akshaya v. M.Kalai Arasi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Akshaya v. M.Kalai Arasi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Athinarayanan Vs Athan

Mariammal Vs Mydeen Beevi, (Died)

V.Kannan, Vs v.Saravanan

S.Ravindran Vs R.Tamilarasi

Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd., Vs Mala

Sally Roopavathi Vs John Isaac Augustin