Dismissed

S.Ravindran v. R.Tamilarasi

Madras HC28 Oct 2021CMSA(MD)/28/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed under the Hindu Marriage Act and CPC. The appellant failed to appear for hearing on multiple dates, indicating a lack of interest in prosecuting the appeal. The Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution without costs.

What did the court decide?

Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

S.Ravindran Vs R.Tamilarasi — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

C.M.S.A(MD)No.28 of 2010

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 28.10.2021

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA C.M.S.A(MD)No.28 of 2010

¶6

S.Ravindran ... Appellant/Appellant/Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

R.Tamilarasi ...Respondent/Respondent/ Respondent

¶9

Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act read with Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code praying this Court to set aside the Judgment and Decree made in C.M.A.No.05 of 2009, dated 08.01.2010, on the file of the District Judge, Karur, confirming the fair and decreetal order made in H.M.O.P.No.19 of 2006, dated 30.03.2007, on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Karur.

¶10

For Appellant : No Appearance

¶11

For Respondent : R.Ganesh Babu

¶12

JUDGMENT

¶13

When the matter was listed on 11.08.2021 there was no representation for the appellant and the matter was directed to be posted on 24.08.2021. On 24.08.2021, there was no representation for the appellant and thereby, this Court directed to post the matter "for dismissal" on 31.08.2021. On 31.08.2021, at request of the learned counsel on either side, the matter was directed to be listed on 07.09.2021 and on 07.09.2021, the counsel for the appellant had taken time. When the matter was posted on 26.10.2021, there was no representation for the appellant and thereby, this Court directed the matter to be listed today (i.e. on 28.10.2021).

¶14

2.Even today, there is no representation for the appellant. The Civil Miscellaneous Second appeal is of the year 2011. When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant and the same clearly indicates that the appellant has not shown any interest to prosecute the appeal any further. Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs.

¶15

Sd/-

¶16

Assistant Registrar (CS II)

¶17

// True Copy //

¶18

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

1/2

¶21

C.M.S.A(MD)No.28 of 2010

¶22

¶23

1.The District Judge, Karur.

¶24

2.The Subordinate Judge, Karur.

¶25

3.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶26

C.M.S.A(MD)No.28 of 2010 28.10.2021

¶27

MGJ/PM(15.11.2021) 2P 5C

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶29

2/2

S.Ravindran v. R.Tamilarasi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Ravindran v. R.Tamilarasi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Athinarayanan Vs Athan

Mariammal Vs Mydeen Beevi, (Died)

V.Kannan, Vs v.Saravanan

Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd., Vs Mala

Sally Roopavathi Vs John Isaac Augustin

M.Akshaya Vs M.Kalai Arasi