Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Bhuvaneswari Vs N. Ramkumar — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

Home
Madras HC
2021
Bhuvaneswari Vs N. RamkumarBhuvaneswari v. N. Ramkumar

Dismissed

Bhuvaneswari v. N. Ramkumar

Madras HC10 Nov 2021CRP/889/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil Revision Petition filed against a fair and decretal order in a suit was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying suit has been decreed.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

C.R.P.(PD)No.889 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 10.11.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI

C.R.P.(PD)No.889 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.4870 of 2016

1.Bhuvaneswari

2.Surambur Kuzhali

3.Ezhil Arasi

4.Jothimani

5.Rajesh Kumar

6.Priyanka

7.Elumalai .. Petitioners

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Bhuvaneswari
respondent
N.Ramkumar

Coram

AI extract

V.M. Velmani

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 10 Nov 2021 · November
Registered: 15 Mar 2016
Case no.: CRP/889/2016

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from V.m.velumani

R.Thiyagarajan Vs Rajapalani
9 Nov 2021
Orintal Insurance Co. Ltd., Vs S. Kamalesan
9 Nov 2021
G.J.Balamurugan Vs Ammasai (Died)
8 Nov 2021
S.Krishnasamy Vs E.N. Madheswaran
10 Nov 2021

Cite this judgement

Bhuvaneswari v. N. Ramkumar, CRP/889/2016 (MAD), decided on 10 November 2021.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

V.M. Velmani

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as infructuous on the ground that the pending underlying suit had been decreed, rendering the revision application baseless.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Vs.

1.N.Ramkumar

2.Ponnusamy

3.Senthamarai

4.Mahalakshmi

5.Rangasamy

6.R.Karthikeyan

7.R.Surindar

8.R.Nandakumar

.. Respondents

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the

1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P.(PD)No.889 of 2016

Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order dated 21.12.2015 made in I.A.No.1289 of 2015 in O.S.No.244 of 2010 on the file of I Additional District Court, Salem.

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Nalliyappan For R1 : Mr.R.Jayaprakash For R3 to R8 : No appearance

ORDER

(The matter is heard through “Video Conferencing/Hybrid Mode”.)

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the present Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair and decretal order dated 21.12.2015 made in I.A.No.1289 of 2015 in O.S.No.244 of 2010 on the file of I Additional District Court, Salem. Pending Civil Revision Petition, the suit in O.S.No.244 of 2010 has been decreed and hence, nothing survives in the Civil Revision Petition.

2.Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel

2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P.(PD)No.889 of 2016

appearing for the petitioners, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

10.11.2021

kj To

I Additional District Judge Salem.

V.M.VELUMANI, J.

3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P.(PD)No.889 of 2016

kj

C.R.P.(PD)No.889 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.4870 of 2016

10.11.2021

4/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CNR

HCMA010655632016

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

Disposal

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Divisiional Office 5 Vs K.Basha

10 Nov 2021

P.Karthikeyan Vs a.Hiranmayee

11 Nov 2021