V.S. Krishna v. a. Sangeetha
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge recorded the petitioners' submission that the Civil Revision Petition was infructuous and consequently dismissed the petition, closing the connected civil miscellaneous petition without delving into merits.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous; the connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.
What the court decided
CRP.PD.No.4385 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.02.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
CRP.PD.No. 4385 of 2017
and
C.M.P.No. 20850 of 2017
1.V.S.Krishna
2.V.Ratnakumari
(Both are represented by their
Power of Attorney Holder,
Mr.K.Prabhakar Naidu,
No.13/15, Gnaga Nagar,
Kodambakkam, Chennai – 600 024.) ... Petitioners
Vs.
1.A.Sangeetha
2.J.Amsaveni
3.The Assistant Engineer,
O & M/TNEB, Panaiyur,
Enjambakkam, Panniyur Kuppam,
Chennai – 600 119. ... Respondents
1/4
CRP.PD.No.4385 of 2017
PRAYER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to set aside the order and decretal order dated 07.12.2016 in I.A.No. 962 of 2014 in O.S.No.1068 of 2013, on the file of Additional District Munsif Court at Alandur.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition is maintainable when the petitioners submitted that it has become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.S.Krishna
- petitioner
V.Ratnakumari
- respondent
A.Sangeetha
- respondent
J.Amsaveni
- respondent
The Assistant Engineer
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court