Dismissed

The Indian Overseas Bank v. Minor K.Deeksha

Madras HC5 Feb 2021CRP/3460/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution, the High Court dismissed the application seeking to strike down a plaint. The dismissal was based on the court's acceptance that the matter between the parties was already settled.

What did the court decide?

The civil revision petition was dismissed. The connected miscellaneous petition was closed. No order as to costs.

The Indian Overseas Bank Vs Minor K.Deeksha — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

CRP.PD.No.3460 of 2009

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 05.02.2021

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

CRP.PD.No.3460 of 2009

¶7

and

¶8

MP.No.1 of 2009

¶9

1.The Indian Overseas Bank,

¶10

A Nationalised Bank having its Branch

¶11

At Namakkal by its Branch Manager,

¶12

Trichy Road,

¶13

Namakkal

¶14

2.The Indian Overseas Bank,

¶15

A Nationalised Bank having its Branch

¶16

At Karur by its Branch Manager,

¶17

80 Feet Road,

¶18

Sengunthapuram,

¶19

Karur-2

¶20

3.The Indian Overseas Bank,

¶21

A Nationalised Bank having its Branch

¶22

At Erode its Branch Manager,

¶23

Park Road,

¶24

Erode ..Petitioners

¶25

Vs.

¶26

1.Minor K.Deeksha D/o K.Kadirvel

¶27

rep. by his Maternal Grand Father, Sivasubramaniam

¶28

2.Minor K.Krithik Kailash, S/o K.Kadirvel

¶29

rep. by his Maternal Grand Father, Sivasubramaniam

¶30

3.K.Kailasam

¶31

1/4

¶32

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶33

CRP.PD.No.3460 of 2009

¶34

4.K.Senthilvel 5.K.Aravinthkumar 6.K.Kadirvel 7.K.Ponnammal 8.A.Selvi 9.K.Arthilakshmi 10.S.Aparna 11.Minor Sri Kunthavi Devi, Rep. by her mother and natural guardian, A.Selvi, 22.A, Good House, Mohanur Road, Namakkal 12.Minor Sri Vanathi Devi Rep. by her mother and natural guardian, A.Selvi, 22.A, Good House, Mohanur Road, Namakkal 13.Singannan 14.Thangammal ..Respondents

¶35

PRAYER:

¶36

The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to strike down the plaint in OS.No.121 of 2009 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Salem.

¶37

For Petitioners : Mr.F.B.Banjamin George

¶38

For Respondents : No appearance

¶39

ORDER

¶40

This Civil Revision Petition is filed praying to strike down the

¶41

plaint in OS.No.121 of 2009 on the file of the Principal District Munsif

¶42

Court, Salem.

¶43

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶44

2/4

¶45

CRP.PD.No.3460 of 2009

¶46

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the

¶47

matter has already been settled between the parties.

¶48

In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the

¶49

petitioners, nothing survives in the civil revision petition for further

¶50

adjudication. Accordingly, this civil revision petition is dismissed.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No order as to
costs.
05.02.2021
Speaking/Non-speaking order
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
lok

¶51

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶52

3/4

¶53

CRP.PD.No.3460 of 2009

¶54

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.

¶55

lok

¶56

To
The Principal District Munsif,
Salem
CRP.PD.No.3460 of 2009

¶57

05.02.2021

¶58

4/4

¶59

http://www.judis.nic.in

The Indian Overseas Bank v. Minor K.Deeksha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Indian Overseas Bank v. Minor K.Deeksha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S. Somasundaram Vs a/M Ellamai Akkirnar

K.S.Ananth Vs Kannan

Kaliyamoorthy (Deceased) Vs Kuppusamy (DIED0

Tamilnadu State Transport Vs M.Felixraj

Tavamani Vs Manjula

Sheela Suganthi Vs Halima Bai