S.Rajendiran v. P.Menaka
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition challenging an execution order requiring a Rs. 2 lakh deposit. The Court held the condition was not onerous as it was less than 15% of the decree amount.
What did the court decide?
Revision petition dismissed; petitioner granted six weeks to deposit Rs. 2,00,000.
What the court decided
CRP (NPD) No. 2850 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.12.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
CRP (NPD) No. 2850 of 2021 And
C.M.P.No. 20641 of 2021
S.Rajendiran ... Petitioner/Petitioner/Judgement Debtor
Vs
- P.Menaka
- C.R.Lakshmipathy
- C.L.Sathish Kumar
... Respondents/Respondents/Decree Holders
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the condition directing deposit of Rs. 2,00,000 under execution proceedings was onerous under Section 115 of the CPC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Rajendiran
- respondent
P.Menaka
Coram
R.Subramanian
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court