K. Ramya v. R.P. Dayalan
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition seeking set-aside of a Family Court custody order made on consent, holding that such modifications require review before the Family Court, not supervisory jurisdiction.
What did the court decide?
Application is dismissed; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(PD).No.2788 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.12.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
C.R.P.(PD).No.2788 of 2021 and
C.M.P.No.20230 of 2021
K.Ramya
.. Petitioner
Vs.
R.P.Dayalan .. Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order dated 03.03.2021 in I.A.No.2 of 2020 in FCOP.No.188 of 2020 on the file of the Family Court at Vellore.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Family Court order made on consent can be reviewed or modified under supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Ramya
- respondent
R.P.Dayalan
Coram
R.Subramanian
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court