D.Dany Heston v. S.Murugan
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petition filed to strike off a plaint on grounds of maintainability under SARFAESI Act. The petitioner's counsel represented the matter was settled out of court. The High Court dismissed the petition.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.04.2021
Coram
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
C.R.P. (PD) No. 243 of 2019
And
C.M.P.No. 1966 of 2019
D.Dany Heston ... Petitioner/Defendant
- Vs-
Mr. S. Murugan ... Respondent/Plaintiff
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to strike off the plaint in O.S.No. 243 of 2018 on the file of the District Munsiff, Sriperambudur as not maintainable in terms of Section 34 of SARFAESI.
***
For Petitioner : Mr. S. Sethuraman For Respondent : Mr. P. Kavitha
ORDER
It is stated by Mr. G. Senthilkumar, learned counsel for the petitioner
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D.Dany Heston
- respondent
Mr. S. Murugan
Coram
C.V. Karthikeyan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court