In a civil revision petition filed under Art. 227 regarding a decree dismissed in 2018, the petitioner argued the main suit's dismissal in 2020 rendered the revision barred by limitation/expiry.
The civil revision petition and the connected miscellaneous petition are both dismissed. No order as to costs (awarded against petitioner).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE: 7.4.2021.
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
C.R.P.(PD) No.81 of 2019
and
C.M.P.No.718 of 2019
M.Ponnurangam Petitioner
vs.
C.Ponnurangam (Died)
1. Rani Ammal
2. Amsa
3. Ambika Respondents
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the Fair and Decreetal order dated 12.10.2018 passed in I.A.No.1216 of 2013 in O.S.No.390 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Chengalpattu.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Prabhakaran
For Respondents : Mr.K.S.Arumugam
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the civil suit against which the present civil revision petition arises itself has been dismissed on 5.10.2020 and therefore, the revision petition does not survive any more.
2
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
Ssk.
costs. The connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed.
7.4.2021.
Index: Yes/No.
Internet: Yes/No.
ssk.
To
The District Munsif Court,
Chengalpattu.
C.R.P.(PD) No.81 of 2019
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a civil revision petition is maintainable when the underlying civil suit has been independently dismissed on a later date.▼
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.Ponnurangam
C.Ponnurangam (Died)
Rani Ammal
Amsa
Ambika
C.V.Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
