Quashed

K.Karunya v. S. Karthiprem

Madras HC29 Sept 2021CRP/2054/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras disposed of a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 seeking speedy disposal of a divorce petition pending before the Family Court, Erode. The court declined to fix a specific time limit but directed the Family Court to dispose of the matter expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

The Family Court, Erode, is directed to dispose of the petition in F.C.O.P.No.211 of 2019 as expeditiously as possible.

K.Karunya Vs S. Karthiprem — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

C.R.P.(P.D).No.2054 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 29.09.2021

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN

¶6

C.R.P.(P.D) No.2054 of 2021
K.Karunya ...Petitioner
Vs.
S.Karthiprem ...Respondent
Prayer :- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India, for speedy disposal of the F.C.O.P.No.211 of 2019, on
the file of the Family Court, Erode, within a time stipulated by appreciating
the above stated facts and circumstances.

¶7

For Petitioner : Ms.C.Meena

¶8

ORDER

¶9

This Civil Revision Petition is filed, to direct the learned Judge, Family Court, Erode, for speedy disposal of the F.C.O.P.No.211 of 2019, within a time stipulated by this Court.

¶10

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶11

1/4

¶12

C.R.P.(P.D).No.2054 of 2021

¶13

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

¶14

petitioner filed F.C.O.P.No.211 of 2019, against the respondent seeking divorce under Sections 13(1) (1A) and (1B) of Hindu Marriage Act. It is further submitted that the respondent filed counter and the matter is pending for enquiry. However, there is no progress in the enquiry. Therefore, the

¶15

present Civil Revision Petition is preferred.

¶16

3.When the matter came up today (i.e) on 29.09.2021, this Court

¶17

enquired about the pendency status of the cases, pending on the file of the Family Court, Erode, the learned counsel for the petitioner was not able to say anything.

¶18

4.Considering the fact that the petition in F.C.O.P.No.211 of 2019

¶19

was filed only in the year 2019, this Court does not want to fix any time

¶20

limit for the disposal of F.C.O.P.No.211 of 2019. However, since the matter is now pending for enquiry, this Court directs the learned Judge, Family Court, Erode, to dispose of the petition in F.C.O.P.No.211 of 2019, as expeditiously as possible.

¶21

2/4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶23

C.R.P.(P.D).No.2054 of 2021

¶24

5.Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No

¶25

costs.

¶26

ep/ay 29.09.2021
Index:Yes/No
Internet:Yes/No
Speaking Order: Yes/No
To
1. The Family Court,
Erode.
2. The Section Officer,
VR Section,
High Court of Madras.

¶27

3/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶29

C.R.P.(P.D).No.2054 of 2021

¶30

G.CHANDRASEKHARAN.J,

¶31

¶32

C.R.P.(P.D) No.2054 of 2021

¶33

29.09.2021

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶35

4/4

K.Karunya v. S. Karthiprem

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Karunya v. S. Karthiprem

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Gopalan Vs M/S. Ramaniyam Real Estates (P) Ltd.

P.Annadurai Vs Pachamuthu Educational Trust

A.Asifbaig Vs Nutan Bai

M/S.Beauty Wares Vs the Chief Manager

Muralichandra Reddy Vs Parvathamma

Thenmozhi Vs George Raja