Partly allowed

Thenmozhi v. George Raja

Madras HC29 Sept 2021CRP/1995/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras passed a Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 directing the Principal District Munsif, Cuddalore, to number an unnumbered interlocutory application filed by petitioners seeking payment of deposited rental arrears and to emit notice to respondents for hearing before passing appropriate orders.

What did the court decide?

Direct the District Munsif to number the interlocutory application, issue notice to respondents, and hear both parties before passing appropriate orders. No costs.

Thenmozhi Vs George Raja — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 29.09.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN

¶5

C.R.P.No.1995 of 2021

¶6

1.Thenmozhi 2.Raja Thilagam 3.Ganesh @ Raja rajan 4.Perumal Raja

¶7

5.Thilagam ... Petitioners/3 rd Party Legal Hears of D1

¶8

¶9

1.George Raja 2.S.Charles Victor 3.S.Jesumani ... Respondents/Plaintiff

¶10

PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the docket order passed in unnumbered Sr.No.898 of 2020 in O.S.No.291 of 2013 on the file of the Registry, In the Court of Principal District Munsif, Cuddalore dated 16.10.2020 and prays to set aside the order passed by the Registry, District Munsif, Cuddalore.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Venkatesh.

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

Thi s Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking direction to the Learned District Munsif, Cuddalore to number the unnumbered interlocutory application Sr.No.898 of 2020.

¶14

2.The case of the Petitioner is that the Suit in O.S.No.291 of 2013 was filed by the Respondents against the father of the Petitioners 2 to 4 seeking the relief of mandatory injunction not to evict the plaintiff by force and except by due process of law. The husband of the First Petitioner has filed H.R.C.O.P.No.6 of 2014 for evicting the Respondents on the ground of willful default and eviction was ordered. Respondents had filed R.C.A.No.02 of 2014. Subsequently, the said R.C.A.No.02 of 2014 was allowed and the matter was remanded to the Learned Rent Controller for fresh disposal. The Respondents have deposited a sum of Rs.11,90,640/- towards rental arrears for the period of 86 months from 03.04.2014 to 18.09.2020 in O.S.No.291 of 2013 and the said amount belongs to the Petitioners. Hence the Petitioners have filed an interlocutory Application under Rule https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 163 to 165 of Civil Rules of Practice and the same was

¶15

returned. Hence, this Petition.

¶16

3.The Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submitted that Respondents are still continuing as tenants in the Suit property in O.S.No.291 of 2013. The Petitioners have initiated separate proceedings under Rent Control Act against the Respondents and the Petitioners do not want to proceed with the said Suit. Under the said circumstances, it is prayed that the rental arrears deposited to be given to the Petitioners.

¶17

4.Apparently the return of the Learned Principal District Munsif, Cuddalore shows that there is no specific reason given for returning the interlocutory Application filed by the Petitioners. Hence, the Learned Principal District Munsif, Cuddalore is directed to number the interlocutory Application filed for issuance of cheque in favour of the Petitioners, and issue notice to the Respondents and hear them and after hearing both the parties, pass appropriate orders.

¶18

5.With the above direction, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Assistant Registrar (CS-VIII)

¶21

//True Copy//

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

ay/ep

¶24

¶25

The Principal District Munsif, Cuddalore.

¶26

Copy To The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras.

¶27

+1cc to Mr.Venkatesh, Advocate, S.R.No. 50291

¶28

C.R.P.No.1995 of 2021

¶29

MG(CO) GN(13/10/2021)

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Thenmozhi v. George Raja

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thenmozhi v. George Raja

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Gopalan Vs M/S. Ramaniyam Real Estates (P) Ltd.

P.Annadurai Vs Pachamuthu Educational Trust

A.Asifbaig Vs Nutan Bai

M/S.Beauty Wares Vs the Chief Manager

Muralichandra Reddy Vs Parvathamma

K.Karunya Vs S. Karthiprem