Mary v. Poongodi
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court directed the District Judge, Coimbatore, to dispose of a final decree application in a partition suit within four months, citing the suit's prolonged pendency.
What did the court decide?
Directed the IV Additional District Judge, Coimbatore, to dispose of I.A.No.2 of 2019 in O.S.No.214 of 2014 within four months.
What the court decided
C.R.P(PD).No.1928 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Date: 16.09.2021
Coram::
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN
C.R.P(PD).No.1928 of 2021
Mary,
W/o.Late. Selvaraj ... Petitioner
/versus/
1. Poongodi,
2. Manimegalai,
3. Uma,
4. Vadivambal,
5. Kavitha,
6. Kandhasamy,
7. Vanaja,
8. Chandra,
9. Uma,
10. Selvaraj,
11. Jenifer,
12. Jayaseeli,
13. Manickam,
14. Arokiyaraj,
15. Vincentraja,
16. Jayamary,
17. Ezhizapeth Rani,
18. Anjelin Rosy, ... Respondents
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the Hon'ble IV Additional District Court, Coimbatore, to dispose of the I.A.No.2 of 2019 in O.S.No.214 of 2014 within a stipulate time
C.R.P(PD).No.1928 of 2021
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court should be directed to dispose of the final decree application in a partition suit expeditiously?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mary
- respondent
Poongodi
- respondent
Manimegalai
- respondent
Uma
- respondent
Vadivambal
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court