Order 7, Rule 11 (a) and read with Section 151 of C.P.C., for rejection of the plaint. The case of the petitioner is that the suit in O.S.No.403 of 2019 was filed, claiming respondent's right of way through the suit road running in Survey Nos.64/1 and 65/1 and other Survey numbers as per the registered road right agreement dated 15.12.2008. The respondent purchased the suit property from the vendor-R.Padmavathi on 24.08.2017. The vendorPadmavathi had purchased the said suit property on 25.10.2012, from one V.R.Vaiyali. Perusal of the road right agreement dated 15.12.2008, shows that the agreement was entered into between Aruna Marketing Firm, represented by its Managing Partner-A.Rajendran and R.Padmavathi, the vendor of the respondent. It is mentioned that Aruna Marketing Firm was owning properties in Survey Nos.64/1 & 65/1 and in other Survey numbers. R.Padmavathi, was owning lands in Survey Nos.57/1, 61/2 and 54/1 to an extent of 3.13 acres and therefore, the said R.Padmavathi agreed to pay Rs.2,00,000/- for the pathway road right. It is said that the pathway right was created in Survey Nos.64/1 & 65/1 and other Survey numbers to reach the lands of Padmavathi in Survey Nos.57/1, 61/2 and 54/1. This right cannot convey any right in the suit property, which was purchased by
