Poongodi v. v. Venkatachalam
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Madras dismissed the Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 as infructuous, accepting the counsel's submission that the matter had become devoid of substance following summons of relevant authorities.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(P.D).No.1893 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.09.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN
C.R.P.(PD) No.1893 of 2021
and C.M.P.No.14699 of 2021
Poongodi ...Petitioner
Vs.
1.V.Venkatachalam
R.Palanisamy (Dead)
2.M.Loganathan
3.S.Muthusamy
4.S.Saravanan
5.K.Chinnayan
6.M.P.Muthusamy
7.M.P.Ponnusamy
A.Senthil Kumar (Dead)
A.Ramasamy (Dead)
Palaniammal (deleted)
8.Sampooranam
9.Minor Dharanees
10.Minor Monees
(Minor respondents 9 & 10 rep.
By their mother and natural guardian
Sampoornam, 8 th respondent herein)
11.Chandra ...Respondents
Prayer :- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decretal order dated
1/4
C.R.P.(P.D).No.1893 of 2021
26.07.2021 passed in I.A.No.897 of 2019 in O.S.No.384 of 2016 on the file of the Sub-Court, Avinashi.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Poongodi
- respondent
V. Venkatachalam
Coram
G. CHANDRASEKHARAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court